What should a child's toy look like?

Many parents' requests should be outsideView and use design, safe and non-toxic;But a mother who bought a Trolls toy for her daughter has discovered a shocking design for the new toy.

In a Twitter video uploaded by the mother, the look is bright and cute, with a button-down device underneath the skirt and between the legs. At the push of a button, the enchanted elf would send out: "Oh! Hip-hop, oh, "and so on similar, surprised after inhaling, and finally laughing sound.

Such a button position, with such a sound, after the video was released, caused a lot of tweets:"Could the company that makes this toy, the company that cooks and rationalizes children, be child abuse?"

In addition to the poor design, another infuriating thing is that the doll, designed for children over the age of 4, is packaged with no mention of buttons and sound devices between the doll's legs, but instead says "Laughing and singing!" "

The packaging with arrows pointed to the doll's stomach, parents buy, naturally think the button will be there. Who would have thought that there was a hidden button between the legs?

Within days of the video's release, hundreds of thousands of North American netizens signed a petition calling for the toy to be released by major retail companies including Target, Amazon and Wal-Mart.

The petition reads: "What would our innocent, easily affected children think of this toy?" Is it fun for someone to touch your private part? Paedophilia and child molestation are the right behaviour? "

The dark chicken thief design, playing side ball ads, is very unpleasant. A few days later, under pressure, the company that makes the dolls announced that it would immediately withdraw from the major supermarkets.

Responding to an interview with CNN, a company spokesman said: "This feature is designed for doll sitting, but we've now found it inappropriate to do so." We do not intend to provide exchange services to consumers. "

Stop loss in time, correct errors, is a good solution. But many push friends are still unhappy, why can't we start with the design, on the well-being of children and physical and mental health to think more about?

In the relevant news, the most discussed isToy manufacturers in the subtle interstitious, sexualized children's toys Sexualized toy of various operations.

In the past, newspaper sisters have discussed the behavior of sexualizing animal characters in cartoons, for examplePaint the animals with big chest cleavage, big ass and heavy makeup.(Point link review)

When sexualized cartoons become actual dolls, the picture is even more shocking. We are familiar with the real human plastic rubber dolls, out of many strange designs.

Dance in revealing bikinis

A fake baby who lets a little girl "breast-feed" herself

Shave baby shaving baby for baby dolls

There's even a baby diaper with a baby design in the belly

A female doll wearing sexy, lip-thick makeup

While dolls for little girls have become sexually affected, little boys' toys have many suggestive designs.

Why is this designed?

And doll drink cups to be designed to use in this position?

Why riding saddle toys, the name is"Ride a Daddie Rides Dad"？

The broom in the Harry Potter movies, with a vibrator in the seat, is introduced to simulate the feeling of flying...

Really, is it necessary? WHY?

Some readers may say, perhaps these manufacturers want to make money, crude, did not think too much, not so on the line?But in fact, you have to think more about the child, otherwise you really let the child become a passive object of sexual acceptance.

At the same time that there was a problem with the design between the legs of the enchanted elf toy, another well-known doll, L.O.L Dolls, was also taken by parents and netizens for its bad sex dolls.

(Doll with nipples exposed)

On the 28th of this month, a mother named Bianca Stone from Queensland, Australia, told local Australian media 7News that her 5-year-old daughter bought the doll, very problematic.

In the photos she took, people could clearly see the doll's sex organ design. Subsequently, more parents have complained about the doll's contents in the past also surfaced.

Some parents posted on the doll's official website that they found that the doll they bought for their children would appear after being soaked in ice waterWear exposed mesh socks and bikinis and stick only cream stickersimage.

There is also a limited level of underwear design

Don't even wear it directly

Baby stuffed with pacifiers, soaked in ice water became dressed sexy look, how to see, how awkward.

Issic Larian, founder of the doll brand, which is popular for its blind box-like concept, has been pushing the image of a big-eyed, lip-synching doll since Bratz in 2001. In the era of the rise of "out-of-the-box culture" on social media, he took it againBlind box and surprise change conceptImplanted into a new product.

Already has a "pre-season" of sexual dolls, coupled with a deep understanding of children and some of the toy-like "collecting habits",L.O.L. Surprise Dolls, which does not explicitly label adult content, sold for $4 billion in 2018 alone.

To tell you the truth, the majority of people love to buy and collect such dolls, there is no problem.But if you want to sell it to children, shouldn't you put an age limit on the packaging?

It is clear that the design department was right to default to sex dolls from the start, and that the interests were not in front of them, so that children's mental health was not in charge. At present, the doll is still selling hot.

(Parents who leave messages expressing dissatisfaction after buying toys for their children)

Suspected paedophile hints at buttons between the legs, blind box dolls that reveal sexual organs directly, girl dolls with heavy makeup and breast-pumping buttocks, emphasis on "big" boy toys,Many times, parents try to protect the child, a careless will be exposed to sexual situations.

Some netizens may ask, "Do dolls have sex organs and are not part of sex education?" Children have the right to know the difference between organs! Why are you so secretive about sex? "

But I would also like to say that there is certainly nothing wrong with sex education for children, and there is no problem in helping children establish the right sexual awareness. But ifIn the case of private goods in commercial conduct, without explicitly informing the guardian, the use of such "exposed sex education" is really debatable.

Sex education should be done by guardians, educators and society, and should not be abducted by commercial acts.

From all kinds of strange cartoons wrapped in fairy tale coats to real sexually suggestive dolls,How much will a child who learns what he sees and hears like a sponge be affected?

(A public service advertisement: Children can learn a lot from the Internet.) )

According to a report by the American Psychological Association,When children are overexposed to sexualization as they grow up, not only does it damage their self-image and self-image perception, but values and self-confidence can be affected, leading to problems such as anxiety, depression, and eating disorders.

After all the controversy and discussion, some netizens simply started their own "anti-sex" dolls, such as this girl named Bee Hale, bought a variety of sexualized dolls, hand-made into no thick makeup, well-dressed dolls.

"I've never been in love with these sexualized dolls since I was a little girl, so I'm going to use my own way to reverse the sex and authentic dolls, " she says.They have all kinds of sizes and normal looks, unlike when I was a kid when I always felt like I wasn't good enough。”

There are also doll companies that have made new changes, such as making dolls with realistic dress codes, and not allowing certain toys to target a single sex, not giving toys heavy makeup, and so on.

Let children's toys return to the toy's properties, but also children a clean childhood.